Board Thread:Help Desk/@comment-5785168-20140417115938/@comment-5754239-20140417162105

Oppose-I do not think that most pages will have enough information to support this new layout. I understand that this makes it similar to how the Clash of Clans Wiki does their articles, but we are not the Clash of Clans Wiki. We've argued over this before. It's the whole "over-information (redundancies) on pages" issue.

Here are the main points why I oppose this suggestion:

~ironwestie (talk) 16:21, April 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) As I've stated above, most articles (such as Production Buildings, Friends Requests,  and Currencies) will not be able to fit this mould because they either talk about more than one thing, they have too much information to put into the mould, or they do not have enough information (such as those pages that only have infoboxes).
 * 2) Implementing this mould will make most of the Hay Day Wiki's Manual of Style redundant because this mould is simply plugging in information. This also makes many of our infobox templates useless, since we will not have them in this layout.
 * 3) I find that this template limits the number of links (and pictures) that one can possibly put onto a page simply because it does not have much space for other text.

Comment-I was the one who started the "Manual of Style thread" and I did not state anything about GorillaMan's layout other than to say that we had not yet resolved the issue.